Reply to a comment

Reply to this comment

yabadabadoo1026 writes:

in response to shoalcreekvol:

This journalism thing must be harder than it looks:

"The 14th-ranked Vols (2-0) connected on 2-of-17 shots from beyond the 3-point arc...UT Martin (1-1) didn’t shoot much better from the perimeter, making only 9 of 36 shots beyond the arc."

UT shot 11.7% from 3, UT-Martin shot 25%. More than twice as good from a percentage standpoint. Since when is 1-out-of-4 not much better than 1-out-of-9? Since when is NINE 3-pointers not much better than TWO 3-pointers?

got to agree with you on that--------I'm excited and think its going to be a great year but some koolaide/bias is showing in those comparative assessments for sure

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.

Features