Reply to a comment

Reply to this comment

Vo2Vol writes:

in response to DougSharp:

"Shurburrt said the Vols' inability to sell early playing time to the few offensive line prospects they targeted for 2012 may have played a part in them coming away with nothing — even though it shouldn't have been"

If UT's recruiters, including Doolfus, wasn't out selling the idea that recruits could realistically compete for a starting position in the spring on an offensive line that was by far and away the absolute WORST in the SEC - then this is reason #412 to make a H.C. change at the end of this year.

Doug, you are one of those funny guys that thinks that changing the coaches name gives you credibility. We have built up offensive lineman and have 3 redshirt freshman. We have depth and they will be better. Of course, you are also one of those that thinks that turning coaches over every two or three years is somehow healthy. If we take your approach, then we will continue to struggle.

Here is the thing. It is always easy to sit back and attack someone in a position that you could never qualify for and critique performance retrospectively. It would be nice if you and some of the other comedians on this site would man-up and get behind this staff and this team and stop critizing what you really have no damn clue about.

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.

Features