Dooley has no reason to complain, so long as everyone faces the same rule.
If the rule requires only one-year scholarships, then Dooley can live with the fact that good athletes will go to schools that offer four-year scholarships. ... If the rules requires four-year scholarships, then everyone else must offer four-year scholarships.
I'll mention that if Dooley favors the one-year scholarship (contract), then at the end of the year he should favor letting athletes transfer schools freely, with no penalty.
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.
Merv writes:
Dooley has no reason to complain, so long as everyone faces the same rule.
If the rule requires only one-year scholarships, then Dooley can live with the fact that good athletes will go to schools that offer four-year scholarships. ... If the rules requires four-year scholarships, then everyone else must offer four-year scholarships.
I'll mention that if Dooley favors the one-year scholarship (contract), then at the end of the year he should favor letting athletes transfer schools freely, with no penalty.
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.