Reply to a comment

There is nothing like a young, ignorant commentary who is illogical as pouring maple syrup over a cowpile,

to make us aware of the 2-bit losers that pushed the gutless Hamilton and the inept, people-pleasing Board of Trustees to fire Fulmer.

Just what was Kiffin's record (making sure you count the certain NCAA two-years' probation that Slive got UT out of if Kiffin and Orgeron left?)

And just what is Dooley's record?

Gotcha. You think that old is reason enough to fire someone. Or maybe your attention span is what educators say is prevalent for the current generation under 35 years old---very much unable to stay on topic for more than a few moments at a time, due to being raised on diets of video games and ADD drugs. So many of them will never be able to develop character enough to stay for the finish. And that cuts MANY comebacks out of the fabric of life.

Fulmer is not the reason at all. He had the program turned after a bad year, and Hamilton made sure Fulmer was fired on Monday of Homecoming, which guaranteed a loss by a team that had struggled but found itself the two weeks before. The reason for the firing was simple: Fulmer and company were on the way to enough wins to guarantee another year, by contract, for Fulmer.

And you, like the ignorant bozos who were continuously disparaging Fulmer's staff, have nothing worthwhile to respond when you look and see that EVERY ONE OF THEM went on to better jobs in coaching, except Jimmy Ray Stevens, the OL coach, who was hired when very few OL coaches were available, to replace Mike Barry.

Guess what: your commentary shows a very, very simplistic line of reasoning---not because of insight, but refusal to research and integrate facts in your argument.

Maybe you want to go play with your X-box or get even more addled with War-craft.

This venue is to much an adult's forum for you and many like you.