"Hiring Cutcliffe wouldn't excite the fan base the way a bigger name would. And perhaps he couldn't lift the program to a championship level. But he would improve it. His track record is long enough to prove that."
Sure, let's sign him to a contract to "improve" the team for 5-7 years, then buy him out in 3, when he hasn't produced a Championship. There couldn't be anything wrong with that, could there? There has been enough time and money spent to improve things. If you are going to replace Dooley, then you need an exciting, young, up-and-coming coach for the long term, as others have said. Sure wish we had gotten Sumlin when Dooley was hired. I heard he was interested in the job at that time, but you couldn't get him out of College Station now with a truckload of dynamite.
Amen I'll second that
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.
chattabluetick writes:
Amen I'll second that
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.