Fulmer's weakest link was that he would not hire the best assistants available - as good as he was at UT, he'd have been even better if he'd have hired good assistants.
If he'd hire the best staff that he could come up with, maybe - in restrospect, things would not be any worse had he been allowed to right the ship. The last four years have certainly sucked.
Every program and every coach that has any longevity goes thru a down cycle. We could do a lot worse, and with each passing day it appears that the candidate pool is drying up.
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.
bbmon13#478091 writes:
Fulmer's weakest link was that he would not hire the best assistants available - as good as he was at UT, he'd have been even better if he'd have hired good assistants.
If he'd hire the best staff that he could come up with, maybe - in restrospect, things would not be any worse had he been allowed to right the ship. The last four years have certainly sucked.
Every program and every coach that has any longevity goes thru a down cycle. We could do a lot worse, and with each passing day it appears that the candidate pool is drying up.
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.