Reply to a comment

Reply to this comment

wcirwin64#584242 writes:

in response to suggest_removal_4_all_troll_posts:

UT 2010: #9
UT 2011: #13
UT 2012: #17

Vandy 2010: #61
Vandy 2011: #70
Vandy 2012: #29

Vandy pretty much beat up on his with those inferior recruits. We'll be quite alright if this class is anywhere near it's #20 ranking.

BTW - for all the naysayers that say UT never had a class this bad -- 2006: #23 2008: #35

Our 2007: #3 made a list of most overrated classes.

Let's keep these kids in school and make 'em football playes over the next 4 years.

LOL. . I did the same thing:
'02 #2
'03 #18
'04 #20
'05 #4
'06 #23
'07 #3
'08 #35
'09 #10
'10 #9
'11 #13
'12 #17
'13 #20
Also, the rankings factor in pure # of players & not just *rankings. Had we just added 4 or 5 3* recruits we would have been in the top 15. Add bell and we're approaching top 10. I think this is a good solid class considering all the obstacles that had to be overcome. Also,don't forget the 3* invited walk-on lineman from Farragut & Charlie High, the walk-on QB from CAK. CBJ saved 5 or 6 scholarships to use for next year. All things considered, nice job !!

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.

Features