Why was having a gun in the trunk necessarily wrong?
Exactly. What law was broken here?
The article states his first strike was when his handgun was used by teammates in a robbery. Other than not securing his weapon, how is that Dyer's problem? His second strike was driving 96 mph? (Why not 100?) I don't think I'd want a football player who had never broken the speed limit. And then they found another gun in his trunk. Oh my. Which law was that again? Back before we all became a nation of limp-wristed, politically correct wimps, we wore our firearm on our hip instead of hiding it in our "trunk".
Talk to him. Evaluate his character for yourself. Use common sense. Then sign him.
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.
Caspian writes:
Exactly. What law was broken here?
The article states his first strike was when his handgun was used by teammates in a robbery. Other than not securing his weapon, how is that Dyer's problem? His second strike was driving 96 mph? (Why not 100?) I don't think I'd want a football player who had never broken the speed limit. And then they found another gun in his trunk. Oh my. Which law was that again? Back before we all became a nation of limp-wristed, politically correct wimps, we wore our firearm on our hip instead of hiding it in our "trunk".
Talk to him. Evaluate his character for yourself. Use common sense. Then sign him.
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.