Tennessee Stat Book
The difference between the Vanderbilt and Tennessee's football programs could be measured in inches Saturday afternoon at Neyland Stadium.
A 49-yard field-goal attempt from Commodores' kicker Bryant Hahnfeldt grazed the outside of the upright and fell harmlessly to the ground with 33 seconds left, leaving the Vols celebrating a 25-24 victory.
"They know they escaped," Vanderbilt senior defensive tackle Gabe Hall said. "We were more physical than them. Bottom line, we smacked them in the mouth, they smacked us in the mouth. That was the most physical team we played all year, by far."
The Commodores built a 24-9 lead through three quarters by out-gaining the Vols (254 yards to 226 yards) and converting an Erik Ainge turnover into a field goal just before the half.
Then came the fourth quarter and the roar of 105,077 strong at Neyland Stadium.
"We didn't move the ball, we didn't execute, they stepped up, and we didn't," Vanderbilt senior offensive tackle Chris Williams said. "They started making plays, it got a little loud, and we didn't get it done."
Tennessee out-gained Vanderbilt 124-16 in the fourth quarter and out-scored the Commodores 16-0.
"Obviously, it hurt us to go three-and-out three times in a row," said Commodores quarterback Mackenzi Adams, who was 14-of-26 for 139 yards and three touchdowns. "Bottom line, we had a good return and a good chance to win the game, but we didn't."
UT's defense turned the Commodores away after they started at the Vols' 42 and were unable to gain more than 11 yards despite getting their only first down of the quarter on a pass interference penalty.
"We gave up a couple of big plays and the momentum shifted," Vanderbilt senior defensive tackle Theo Horrocks said. "When the momentum shifts, it's hard to bounce back, especially in an atmosphere like this.
"Their crowd got back into the game, we kind of got down and couldn't get ourselves out of the hole."
Former Central High School star Cassen Jackson-Garrison was understandably glum in the wake of the loss.
"We should have won that game," said Jackson-Garrison, who had 83 yards on 17 carries and will graduate with degrees in human organizational development and health and human services in December.
As for how the gap between Tennessee-Vanderbilt football has changed since Jackson-Garrison arrived in Nashville, the senior said, "It's closed - case closed."
Commodores' coach Bobby Johnson acknowledged the momentum changed when Broderick Stewart was called for roughing the punter with 1:27 left in the third quarter, sustaining a Vols' TD drive that made it 24-16.
"That's how I saw it," Johnson said. "We came to win. Everybody in that (locker) room is very disappointed. But it isn't one play, it isn't two plays and it isn't three plays. It's all of them."
Another play that changed the complexion of the game came when UT's Eric Barry delivered a hit on an airborne Earl Bennett with just under four minutes left in the first half.
Bennett, the SEC's all-time career receptions leader, returned for just one play in the second half, finishing the game with two catches for 26 yards. Johnson said Bennett's back tightened up from the hit/fall on the play.
"Obviously, Earl is a proven star, so we'd love to have had him in there," Johnson said. "Would it have made a difference? I have no idea."
Johnson praised his team for its effort.
"There have been years we've come over here and haven't come close to winning," Johnson said. "We started a long ways away from Tennessee's program.
"We didn't win today, but we're getting closer.''
Saturday, the Commodores were within a foot.





Vanderbilt 93, Tennessee 79, Feb. 9…
Signing day celebration at Neyland…
Notre Dame beats Tennessee 72-44…











Scripps Interactive Newspapers Group
Comments » 9
shane6#638715 writes:
close only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades...RTYAB
DCVolFan writes:
Vandy's been within inches before. They're a prep-school. They only know how to close deals in board rooms. Not on the football field.
DenmarkVol_aka_Mbumburu writes:
Some really foolish comments from you people. Vanderbilt outplayed us today, period, and could have/should have won the game.
This ain't your daddy's Vanderbilt. They deserve our respect.
stevefrommemphis writes:
As Joe Thompson used to say on his post-game show: "If you can't say something good about Tennessee, say something bad about Vanderbilt."
I'll tell you what I escaped, Mr. Vandy -- by graduating from UT, I escaped wasting the equivalent of $50,000 per year in 2007 dollars to attend undergraduate school in Nashville.
As soon as that roughing the kicker penalty happened, I knew Tennessee had their break and would probably win the game. Granted, I thought it would be a little easier than it turned out to be. But this is the same story, umpteenth verse.
In 1974, all Vanderbilt had to do was punt the ball, and they would win. The kicker inexplicably ran with the ball, turned it over to UT, and UT tied the game. Similar outcomes have happened many times since, including today.
I wish there were some way to predict whether Vandy is going to play the Vols close and give fans an entertaining game to watch, or lose 65-0. I seem to always skip the good games (like today's) and end up attending the blowouts.
Colliervol writes:
Coulda, shoulda, woulda. Close doesn't count. I could say that a perennial loser found a way to blow a 15 point lead but that would be cruel, wouldn't it? It's more accurate to say that UT got off the mat and took it from them.
One more to go. Just do it and the debate ceases (for this year at least).
eefor10c writes:
Vandy's first touchdown drive was "aided" by three first down penalties and they probably would not have had a touchdown. The "interference" penalty flag on Vandy's last drdive was thrown too late to be a justified call and from 15 or more yards away with nothing from the official that was right on the play. Without that call the missed field goal wouldn't have happened. Jackson-Garrison, the difference between the two schools is not closed! One win in 23 years does not make it so. You lost. GO vols. mbumburu, could have/should have doesn't count. YOU LOSE because you want the Vols to lose!
vol_in_lsu_land writes:
CollierVol said...."Coulda, shoulda, woulda. Close doesn't count. I could say that a perennial loser found a way to blow a 15 point lead but that would be cruel, wouldn't it? It's more accurate to say that UT got off the mat and took it from them.
One more to go. Just do it and the debate ceases (for this year at least)."
You know, you bring up an interesting point here.
UT blows a halftime lead against Spurrier coached USC only to win the game in the clutch, and the talk is that SC was the better team and should have won the game.
Vanderbilt blows a halftime lead but fails to pull it out in the end. Yet they are still given more credit than the Vols and are called the better team, deserved to win etc.
Do you see how illogical this is? Of course not, cuz your minds are too clouded with irrational emotion.
In both cases the Vols were the victors in the end. And no matter how you spin it, the team with the most points on the board is the team that deserved to win.
givemsix writes:
Thank God Tennessee pulled this one off. The fact that Vanderbilt is recruiting more talent and putting more effort into winning is obvious. Football brings big money (consider last years Tennesse athletic department donating millions of extra cash to the academic department) and winning means even more big money. Tennessee will hopefully improve their strategy to get back on top. We are not back on top just because of one good win vs. Arkansas and one darn lucky win against Vandy. I feel quite a bit of stress concerning Kentucky and Lord be with us if we get to play LSU in Atlanta. The dance aint over yet.
The rules have changed but Tennessee hasn't. Hopefully we will soon.
alfrizzle097 writes:
Bottom line is that UT made its second largest comeback in school history to win. The defence showed some back bone. Kentucky would worry me if it weren't Kentucky..... then again see Notre Dame-Navy.
I agree with bricker though. Its amazing how fickle people are. No need to be negative when we win, but at least stick to your guns. If you think Fulmer is a good coach, that doesn't change if we lose to or beat Vanderbilt one year.
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.