Gameday
Links
- Vol Report: Published Oct. 7, 2007
- PostGame audio slide show: UT vs. Georgia
- Box Score: UT vs. Georgia
- Watching with Ward: Review the game, play-by-play
Articles
- ‘Putting it together’
- Vols show some power with running game
- Numbers add up to a dominant defensive effort
- New formation, Colquitt aid kick coverage
- Dawgs' Richt: 'They beat us soundly'
- Adams: Change of identity alters season's course
Vol Audio
- Dave Hooker interviews OL coach Greg Adkins
- Dave Hooker interviews RB coach Kurt Roper on UT's new punt formation
- Dave Hooker interviews offensive coordinator David Cutcliffe
- Dave Hooker interviews WR coach Trooper Taylor
- Dave Hooker interviews DB coach Larry Slade
- Dave Hooker interviews WR Austin Rogers about UT's running game against Georgia
Tennessee Stat Book
Tennessee's special teams were incredibly erratic against Georgia in 2006. Saturday, they provided the consistency they'd lacked all season.
After giving up kickoff and punt returns for touchdowns last year in Athens, the Vols held Georgia in check during a 35-14 win at Neyland Stadium.
Much of the credit has to go to junior punter Britton Colquitt, who kicked off for the first time this season. Colquitt was good for two touchbacks and was consistently dropping his kicks inside the 5-yard line.
"Britton is the difference," head coach Phillip Fulmer said. "We'd been hanging it 3.6 or 3.7 (seconds) and he kicks it up there 4.1 or 4.2 and where we need it to be kicked. We didn't coach it any better or any worse. The player made the difference."
That's exactly what the Vols needed, considering they were ranked 82nd in the nation in kickoff coverage before the Georgia game.
Colquitt hadn't handled kickoffs this season because of a pulled quadriceps in his kicking leg.
Kickoff coverage was just one example of UT's improved special teams. The Vols yielded only 5.5 yards on two punt returns against Georgia, after ranking last (118th) in the NCAA heading into Saturday's game.
UT unveiled a new spread punt formation against Georgia. Assistant coach Kurt Roper said the new formation allows his players to attack down the field sooner, instead of having to step back to maintain the line's integrity.
The Vols had given up two punt returns for a touchdown this season.
"Just trying to come up with ways to get guys tackled," Roper said. "You can get guys out faster."
Roper said the new look likely caught Georgia off guard. He wouldn't rule out returning to the traditional punt formation, but said it would be difficult to switch between the two during the season.
UT also provided a big play in special teams, blocking a punt in the second quarter that led to a touchdown.
Fulmer's Response: In his post-game press conference Fulmer gave a critique of a column written by John Pennington that appeared in Saturday's edition of the News Sentinel. Pennington's column included comments by a number of unnamed former UT players questioning player development, intensity in the strength program and practice philosophy.
"Ordinarily I'm a pretty big boy and can take and ignore almost anything," Fulmer said. "I thought it was an incredible cheap shot to say something about former players, unnamed players, talking about our program, particularly with a big game like this with a lot of prospects coming in.
"It hit a dang nerve and I don't appreciate it. I usually don't respond, but in this case I think our football team and our program deserve a response.
"I have relationships with the players who have been through this program and if they have something to say they can certainly say it to me (rather than) through a person who's never walked on our practice field or never been to a meeting or a press conference that I know of since I've been here.
"It was an incredible cheap shot is what it was."
Pennington, who is not a staff member of the News Sentinel, responded to Fulmer's comments with an e-mail late Saturday.
"I'm disappointed that Phillip Fulmer was upset by the column. But I stand by it. My job is not to report (either in The Sentinel or on my television show), it's to give an opinion.
"In having a number of former Vols talk to me about issues that they have seen, I thought that this was exactly the type of story that fans would be interested in hearing. I made no bones about the fact that this was one group's opinion. And I also pointed out very plainly that every player I spoke with believes in Coach Fulmer and believes he can fix the issues they've observed.
"As far as me being on-campus, I'm not a beat writer. I'm a columnist and a show host. Getting to like or dislike coaches does not help with objectivity. The analysts on my show provide nuts and bolts, I provide opinions. And anyone who has read my columns or seen my show knows that I try very hard to be objective and fair toward the Vols."
Injury Report: Freshman cornerback Brent Vinson left the game with an injured left shoulder. Defensive backs coach Larry Slade said he expected Vinson to be fine.
Eric Young had a head injury. His status is not yet known.
In Young’s absence, UT moved sophomore right guard Chris Scott to left tackle, replacing Scott with sophomore Jacques McClendon at right guard.
Slade Said He Would: Slade predicted on Tuesday that senior free safety Jonathan Hefney would play well against Georgia.
Hefney responded with an interception and two tackles.
“He works so hard and has so much pride, sooner or later he’s going to be Jonathan Hefney,” Slade said, “and he was that way today.”
Smith Has Last Laugh: UT Legends honoree Chuck Smith said he'd be smiling all the way back to Atlanta. The former defensive end a made a bet with one of his media friends in Georgia.
"It was a hell of a day for me," Smith said. "There’s a guy in Atlanta on TV who took an on-air public bet that if the 'Dogs won I would wear a red wig and have to sing their fight song, but if the 'Dogs lost, he had to put an orange wig on and sing 'Rocky Top' at the top of his lungs. It’s a great day."
Top Trio: Erik Ainge’s 165 passing yards against Georgia moved him past Andy Kelley (6,397) for third most passing yards in school history. Ainge now trails only Casey Clausen (9,707) and Peyton Manning (11,201).
Visitors: Former UT quarterbacks Tee Martin and Rick Clausen were in attendance Saturday.
© 2007, Knoxville News Sentinel Co.
Want to use this article? Click here for options!
Tennessee practices in Rhode Island
Neyland Renovation nearly complete










Scripps Interactive Newspapers Group
Comments » 75
FWBVol writes:
Phillip Fulmer has every right to be upset by the Pearl Harbor job Pennington did on him with the column. I have a newspaper background and nobody has to tell me about a column often being an opinion piece, but in most cases someone is stating their opinion or opinions of named sources. It's one thing to cite an unnamed source when you are dealing with organized crime, but it's another thing to do so when talking about one's former coach. By Pennington not naming these players he hurts his own credibility. Were the players starters or backups? If they were starters, what level of success did they enjoy with the Vols? Were any of the players those that were dismissed from the program? No names equals no news or opinions, just unfounded statements.
I hate that it takes away from a great win. It's hard to imagine a punter/kicker could control the game like Britton Colquitt did today, but the special teams proof was in the pudding. Go VOLS!!!
Hunter writes:
There's no excuse for attacking Pennington - I'd go back to paying A LOT more for this site if everyone wrote as frankly and insightfully as JP. Did anyone see this press conference? Did Fulmer scream out "I'M A MAN - COME AFTER ME!" like the OSU coach?
Phil, let's just be happy for a win and send John an e-mail with a picture of your house, cars, boats, vacation destinations.....that would add to his perspective, I think.
alfrizzle097 writes:
Pennington generally does do a good job of being objective. That said... I deplore the negativity that I hear on the radio and read in the paper. Recruits hear all of it. Most of them even probably read the comments on this site. Do you honestly believe that the criticism is going to help land any recruits?
At the end of the season we can step back and analyze the program and make a decision about Phil. Until then just try to support your team while making specific criticisms where appropriate. Not just fire Fulmer or the Vols suck.
GO VOLS!!!
alfrizzle097 writes:
Additionally, the fans I have observed at the games must be the most classless in the nation. F Georgia does not constitute an appropriate rally cry. An institution of higher learning should be able to expect more from its fans than that.
Pullingguard writes:
Pennington needs to focus on the positives at UT with the victory and effort given verses Georgia. It's very easy to get caught up in all the negativity being vocalized and written by the amatures who propose to be true Vol fans. Hopefully the community and the press can embrace this team for the remainder of 2007 and help them attain the best record possible. There has been too much negative post and prints already.
creepykev#228270 writes:
If Penningtons column pissed him off enough to fire back then it was well justified. He must have channeled that anger into his players because that is the most emotion I have seen out of them in a while.
sandboxpup#222155 writes:
Pennington accomplished exactly what he meant to. He didn't write that article to fire up the team...he wrote it to fire up his ratings. Now that Coach Fulmer has responded, there should be a little more interest in his Sunday show. Personally, I think the column/editorial/rumormill was not worthy of a spot in today's paper, but I guess there wasn't another Ron Higgins article they could borrow.
Urbiewerecomingtogetyou writes:
Posted by CRVol on Oct.2 2007 at 2:26 p.m.
I'll lay whatever price you want to name that we will not beat UGA by 21 points as you tend to believe.
Posted by jwraymond1 on October 2, 2007 at 3:01 p.m. aj-your prediction of us winning by 21pts is a joke. Who is going to score 5 TD's for us?
The good:Coach Fulmer The Bad:CRVol The ugly:his cronies- You know who you are.
2000man writes:
If it takes a column by Pennington every week to get this team fired up (focused and prepared!) then I'll take a Pennington column questioning the Vols coaching staff every week!
DenmarkVol_aka_Mbumburu writes:
John Pennington, I personally thought the article was fine and needed. Many of us out here would LOVE to hear former players' opinions about the state of the Vols. And we did.
I can also understand Fulmer's anger. I don't mind it as long as it gets him mad and fired up.
snafu14u#241639 writes:
Pennington's article was absolutley correct. On all counts. I am delighted that it got a response out of Fulmer, about damn time.Hope Fulmer and the team stay in a "bad humor" for the remainder of the season and the bowl game.Things are looking up.bonzaivol
firefulmer writes:
Is Fulmer pathetic or what? Just another reason to despise him even more. It is so sad that it takes a negative article to get the coaches/players fired up. Where has this "fire" been the last five years?? Let's hope the Sentinel has at least 3-4 more negative articles this year.
tnvolfan1 writes:
To the person who said we will win by 21 points was right on the money. I am proud of the vols for a well played game. Go Vol's
texan writes:
Sure looks like a lot of you guys stopped at your local Pilot and filled up with orange kool-aid on the way home from the game. You still don't get it. Fulmer needs the criticism to get motivated and to motivate. If he didn't guys like Pennington would buy into phooey like "stay the course" . Then where would we be? The people who write critical things in these blogs are the equivalent of those who put on their orange every Saturday and scream their lungs out for the Vols. And by the way I would bet that 99% of these people are as happy today as any Vol fan. I know that I am. Good Job John Pennington and Mr. Higgins. And Fulmer..you really think that your little tirade is going to keep former players and others silent?
RocketVol writes:
To Coach Roper - way to go! Good thinking - we need more of that kind of innovative thought.
To Pennington - don't let up! The truth may sting but the warm bath Fulmer's been in needs stirring. He needs to wake up and realize he is NOT surrounded by yes-men and change is in order - now.
BTW - great job yesterday to Fulmer and the other coaches. Can you develop a winning habit?
CrankE writes:
What I'm hearing out of this is a real concern about WHO said this instead of WHAT they actually said. What damage was done? Prospects might read this. ??? An opinion is what it is. Did these guys lie or is the truth unpleasant? Fulmer did not challenge the WHAT of the column at all. Fulmer's response concerns me. Well, at least he didn't have a Grundy-Krakatoa eruption on it.
I wonder if Fulmer would have said anything had Tennessee lost this game?
One thing I know; Keep playing like this and there won't be anymore columns like that.
DarthVol writes:
All the articles that have been written lately about the state of the program...and he picks Penningtons' to call out?
maples#214224 writes:
It is not too often that you hear someone say, "We really out coached them." May Pennington needs to write an article every week if it helps Fulmer understand that he needs to be ready to play football every SAT in the SEC. Great win, give the Great Pumpkin his due, but the season in long from over. Go Vols.
rayp#231048 writes:
Here is what I wrote on Oct. 4th in response to the article about the performance of Phillip Fulmer and all of talk about Phillip's replacement.
"Phillip is a class act and has run a very solid program with 05 being the exception rather than the rule. Everyone wants to see UT win championships and be a winner and with Phillip we have person who has the experience,leadership and integrity to get us there.
A win over Georgia and a smack down by LSU over Florida and all of a sudden we are in the driver's sear in East, admittedly with a lot of work left to be done. For all of Phillip's critics, take a breath and let's see how our young team performs the rest of the season. I'll expect to have you all having a big plate of crow at Thanksgiving as we head to beat Kentucky in November and on to the SEC Championship Game. Even more crow for New Year's if we are 12-2 and Sugar Bowl champs!"
We are in the driver's seat in the east as predicted and this is going to be a great year for the Vols!
agentorange writes:
Pennington's article was phooey and he shouldn't have written it with prospects in town. nice of the kns to try and disown him after publishing his article.
sbcheek#336574 writes:
Pennington's columns are chicken feed compared to the pithy VolExtra posts. I am not too crazy about those cutsie song lyrics either. Normally, coach Philbio would not even have given lip service to anyone's column. The pressure must be getting to him. If he really wants a "cheap shot" and his "dang nerves" rattled, he should read these VolExtra posts. Keep on posting!!
mtnvol writes:
To write an "insider's look" article and never be on campus is lame. Opinions are like a$$ holes, everybody has one...or in this case, is one. Just look at the "writer" who wrote that hatchet job on OSU. She's a real hero (that's sarcasm, Pennington). The sporting world, for the most part, thought she was a hack.
John, "fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son." It isn't one of your cute little song lyrics, but I think it fits.
why36knot#656113 writes:
Knowing how to spell the word OBJECTIVITY is the sum total of Pennington's understanding of the term.
He writes as if he has the wisdom of the ages as his sources. He thinks because 15 people call in and bash Fulmer that that constitutes a majority opinion. None of the local talk shows get enough calls on a daily basis to form that kind of conclusion. There are probably no more than 100 different callers to The Sports Animal's daily programs and not all of them are bashing Fulmer. The truth is that out of those 100 most of them call every day to each program , so how many different callers are there? He doesn't give fans credit for any knowledge at all.
Personally I don't need a writer or a talk show caller to tell me if I can enjoy a football game or whether I should support a Coach or a team.
They are all so invested in Fulmer getting fired that they don't know how to be fans. They have been losers them selves for so long they want the team to lose so they can continue to write, print and verbalize their garbage.
Crawl back in the hole you live in guys and stop trying to pull the rest of us in with you.
bloodrunsorange writes:
Because our recruiting base is not Florida, Georgia, Texas, or California we need all the help we can get. Recruiting is the life blood of any program. Even Hugh Durham could win with enough talent. I remember some of Woody Hayes’s teams that anyone could close their eyes and point to 11 to play and win most of their games. Anything you can do to help in recruiting is good but anything bad is disastrous. Tennessee has GREAT kids but not as many as we would like! Always remember, “BIG ORANGE COUNTRY” is bigger than any individual and we always try to support the “VOLS” all we can! CONGRADULATIONS VOLS!
Colliervol writes:
Enjoyed the win. Best performance since the Cal game last year. But I have a question. What does it say when it takes a newspaper article to get a team and coaches this fired up? Or comments on ESPN by all their pundits about the direction of the program? If that's what it takes for the coaches and players to get excited, maybe JP should write one every week.
Basketball_Jones writes:
Pennington is the best on this page, Fulmer shouldn't need a writer to motivate him, the damn 2 million a year is motivation enough. Great win by UT but Mr. Fulmer this means your still on the hot seast and better have 7 more wins in ya.
johnlg00#206211 writes:
I have to chuckle at some of the Pennington bashers. His columns said nothing that many of the posters to this site have not also said. It doesn't take a program insider to see that our record against the elite programs has steadily worsened in recent years. Anyone who has ever seen a football game can see that our blocking and tackling has been subpar for the same period. Vol supporters spend untold amounts of money to build the finest facilities anywhere and pay the coaches salaries well above average for this market. It is not unreasonable to expect to BE among the nation's elite programs. When one sees the same type of sluggish, predictable under-performance game after game, one is entitled to ask what is wrong. I have met Phillip and several of the other coaches; they seem to be nice guys. In the past, they demonstrated that they know what they are doing. So the simple question is, why aren't they getting results at the level that they themselves established? I was thrilled by the Vol team effort I saw Saturday. If CPF was mad enough to coach the team up to such a level after a few bad reviews by columnists, talk-show callers, and web-site posters, then, for my money, we need MORE of that! Hey, whatever works that is within the rules of the game and common morality! There is, or certainly should be, a difference among those who hate CPF, perhaps because of resentment at what they think was his role in ousting Johnny Majors, those who love CPF because they are fishing buddies or whatever, and those who love UT and want to see the maximum possible success for the program, whoever is in charge. I am in that last group. If we see more of the team we saw against Georgia, week after week, CPF can stay here until he chooses to retire. If we revert back to the level we had fallen to against Cal and Fla, and indeed the average performance of the last six or seven years, then CPF needs to retire, with our thanks, and we need to get someone else who can do the job. Simple as that.
kevinlimbo#326134 writes:
How about thanking Pennington for waking the coaching staff and players up.
Colliervol writes:
Amen johnlg00. If this is one of your first posts, I look forward to more because it is right on target. Some will never give Phil credit because of the Majors thing and our lackluster performance for several years now. Some will proudly proclaim that we are great again simply because of one win. And some of us will watch the season play out before deciding if things are turning or not. (Didn't we say the same thing last year after the Georgia game?)
Just to put things in perspective, I heard a stat Friday and I haven't had time to look into it. (Maybe one of our more computer literate folks can check it out and tell me if it's true or not.) Coming through Nashville Friday, a radio caller said that our record in the last 18 games against SEC teams with winning records (at the time of the game) was 4 and 14. If that statistic is true, this one makes it 5 and 14. And if that's true, that is still unacceptable and I don't care which side you fall in on.
kevinlimbo#326134 writes:
(This comment was removed by the site staff.)
objk1#231846 writes:
The Pennington article was exactly what most of us have been thinking for years.
Nice article, too bad it takes a reporter with no access to the program to fire up the coaching staff and players.
DSaVol writes:
Pennington is an irrelevent wannabe playing the typical "what will get me ratings" game. Unbelievably I actually agree with what the head coach said - it was a cheap shot article - but what else is there to expect from an amateur blogger who has to rely on "anonymous" sources. Perhaps they're anonymous because they only exist in his mind. It's real simple JP - name em or forget em.
georgiavol91#379211 writes:
Doesn't everyone see that yesterday's game proves Pennington's point?
Question: Why haven't we been playing like that all year?
Answer: It's not the players, the same kids are dressing out for each game. So what happened differently? The coaches finally did their job for a change!
IT'S THE COACHING, STUPID!
blhvols#210231 writes:
Hey georgiavol91, I guess the So Cal fans will be asking for Carrol's head and asking "why we haven't played like that all year". Certainly stupid knows stupid!!!!!!!!
yeavols#228407 writes:
Right on Georgiavol91. It's sad that the VOL nation had to be at odds with each other to get Fulmer moving and do his job. Now, after yesterday's game, I AM READY to STAY THAT course. I just hope this wasn't a game just to get everyone off Fulmer's back and where things go south again. But Congrats to our VOLS! It was great to see the coaches and players show enthusiasm again. Also, it was nice to see the fans cheer loudly. I am still at a loss as to why this hasn't always been the case.
yeavols#228407 writes:
oh and somone has a lot of exlaining to do regarding why we haven't seen this type of play for a while. Pennington tried to explain it, but apparently Fulmer took it the wrong way.
eefor10c writes:
What are Pennington's credentials? He just shows up and get a salvage company to sponsor him and a newspaper that will pay him for a hatchet job and then KNS says he's not on our staff but a contract writer. You printed it KNS. Yesterday on the pre-game show Pennington said "I don't normally use anonymous sources" but you were willing to make an exception in this case. How do these nine know so much about practice, etc? Obviously you have never been there and don't know! How many of these players had been kicked off the team? If the players want to say it they should be PROUD to let their name be known instead of being afraid of being "blackballed" as you said on the show yesterday. I agree with Coach Fulmer that it was an incredible cheap shop and I'm glad he responded to your hatchet job!!
knoxmike56#261027 writes:
I have long been a big Pennington fan....now I'm not. Sorry, kinda cheap. He's better than that. I hope he'll return to his historical "classy" editorial-izing....
BOASoldier writes:
CRnonVOL, jwraymond, NCcolt, Stay the freakin course!!!! 21 points over GA can't be done huh.? Dang,,, tell that to our boys in Orange now.
sigmundoooz#264365 writes:
Unnamed sources or not, they stated their opinion and they have more expertise to do so than any of the Orange Brainwashed yahoos on this board. All I know is that UT has as good of a group of talented players as any school in the country. Actually, defensively, they probably have a lot better than just about anybody else judging by the number of players that have gone on to play in the NFL. So why has the defense been so sub-par over the last few years? There was absolutely no excuse for teams like Florida to DOMINATE the UT defense. That comes down to getting outcoached. Chavous always seems to be held in such high esteem but all I see is underachievement.
flstf writes:
why36knot exactly! Pennington knows the sum total of "0", nothing, Nada, zilch, about the game of football. The guy is a joke and has no creditability.
AlpharettaVol writes:
We read news stories almost daily where anonymous sources are quoted, but this is almost always done where the person being quoted is a government employee or corporate "whistle blower" that fears reprisal if his/her identity was known. In the case of of the Pennington column I can find no reason for these to be anonymous sources except that maybe those persons might be embarrassed if we knew who they were. If their names were used it would allow the readers to better evaluate their comments and put them in the proper perspective. Mr. Pennington, ask your former athletes to have the courage to step forward and be counted.
GrandCanyonVol writes:
Running the football is key. It pulls the defence up and allows you to throw. The line on both sides of the ball must win the battle for the whole machine to operate. I was proud yesterday. And would like to be proud next week. Play it like it should be played fellows.
waterskier3#226480 writes:
again if the vol nation will accept 2 and 3 losses a year than fulmer's our guy. he had two weeks to prepare for an overrated ga team, he told his coaches and players that the world thought they sux so if the team came out flat after all of that then he knew his butt was gone..... so a great win because cbs kept showing ga phooey and the last second ga win in 2001.. so they expected it to be a ga day :)
we still have 3 teams that can beat us so all you kool-aid drinking fans keep sipping because its a long season.... and yes if you are so sure we'll be in atlanta go ahead and make reservations and get an ebay account because you'll be selling them in december....
rootin4volz writes:
Pennington's "job is to give an opinion"...UNFORTUNATELY, opinions are like a****les...Everybody's got one, and they usually stink. If that's your job, John, then I'd be curious to know who your boss is if you aren't a staff member of the News-Sentinel. I'm not a staff member of the News-Sentinel, yet if I want to have an opinion, it dang sure won't show up in the Sports section, but in the OPINION section with all the other letters to the editor. And Fulmer is absolutely right...You picked a bad time to air your "opinion."
rootin4volz writes:
P.S.--It DOES make you look like a ratings-monger, J.P. Pure self-interest, proven by the fact that you're not a staff member of the News-Sentinel.
volfan39#234125 writes:
Listen we are still 3-2 with 2 of the 3 against minor league foes, so 1 win against Ga. still doesnt put out the fire under Phil's butt. It's funny how the threat to job security motivates even a lazy, uninspired staff like we been putting up with the last few YEARS!!. I did think the "D" looked like the old Tenn. teams and to quote a t.v. announcer, up until yesterday, "this was not your father's Tennessee defense". Keep up the fire boy's and continue to carry your coaching staff until someone steps up and get's you a REAL coach. This turnaround just proves that the staff has been sitting on thier paychecks--come on, were 6 wks into the sched. What were you coaches doing all spring and pre-season. A win now and then is not what Tenn. football has EVER been about. Keep the chin straps buckled boys, you may not have to wait on a leader very much longer!!Stevie still waits as does Nickie Satan.
aj_vol#248433 writes:
Where are CRVol and jwraymond?
I guess it was too embarrassing for them to "FACE THE MUSIC" today after the Vols crushed their hopes of ousting CPF with a Bulldog win yesterday - OBTW the margin of victory was 21 pts fellas.
shopsports#273141 writes:
The most significant thing about Pennington's article was he managed to get 9 players to talk to him out of twenty years worth. Hmmm....you do the math. I feel sure he also emphasized the single negative out of a dozen positives in any opinion voiced, or he wouldn't have had a story now would he? Totally irrelevant, but if it fired up the group, it must have been a good thing. We need the FIRE we saw last Saturday. That is all that is missing.
why36knot#656113 writes:
What really amazes me is how many of these Fulmer Bashers think that what Pennington wrote had anything to do with the oucome of the football game. All you guys who want to say that articles like his and commsnts by talk show callers do any thing to motivate players and coaches are out of your ever loving minds. It motivates paople like myself and others to contradict what you claim to be the problems. Players and coaches don't care what you say about them and they are not motivated by things said in the paper or on talk shows. What does hurt is the message you try to send to recruits both now and in the future. You are so wrapped up in your own selfish thoughts and your desire to see a coaching change that you actually believe something you say can bring that about.
GET OVER IT!!! IT AINT GONNA HAPPEN THAT WAY.
You guys have absolutely no say so in what happens to Coaches or players . It takes a pretty warped self image to believe otherwise.
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.