Audio
- Dave Hooker interviews DT coach Dan Brooks
- Dave Hooker interviews WR coach Trooper Taylor
- Dave Hooker interviews QB Erik Ainge
- Dave Hooker interviews TE Chris Brown
- Dave Hooker interviews P Britton Colquitt
- Dave Hooker interviews DE Xavier Mitchell
- Dave Hooker interviews OG Vladimir Richard
- Dave Hooker interviews DT Dan Williams
WVLT video
Tennessee Stat Book
Event Details
- What: Tennessee at Florida
- When: Saturday, Sept. 15, 2007, 3:30 p.m.
- Where: Ben Hill Griffin Stadium
- Cost: Not available
- Age limit: All ages
David Cutcliffe has been calling plays for 15 years on the college level and he's here to tell you third-and-short isn't what it used it be.
The yards and inches measure the same as they did when Red Grange was playing. It's not that.
What's changed is the difficulty factor in getting them.
If Tennessee fans are frustrated at the Vols' inability to consistently convert third-and-short and keep the chains moving, the coaches and players are right there with them.
And as sure as Florida fans will extend their arms and do the Gator chomp Saturday, a couple of short-yardage conversions will be pivotal in UT's success or failure at The Swamp.
Cutcliffe, UT's offensive coordinator, admitted Tuesday that third-and-short weighs heavily on his mind.
"If you look at the game today,'' he said, "if you watch the NFL and watch good Southeastern Conference teams, third-and-one-and-a-half, is that short? That's my question.
"We used to just line up, third-and-2 or less, it was automatic, you were going to line up and run the ball and make the first down.''
Defensive players got bigger, stronger and quicker. More teams commit safeties to stopping the run, Cutcliffe said.
So sometimes you have to get creative. Instead of handing the ball to Arian Foster, you flare him out and flip a pass.
Or you sub in Lucas Taylor or Jonathan Crompton for Erik Ainge at quarterback and let them do their best Tim Tebow or Vince Young impersonation.
All are fresh examples from the 2007 season. None of them worked.
If the Vols make a couple of those short-yardage plays at Cal, chances are they win. There's no punt that DeSean Jackson returns for a touchdown. Instead of a failed fourth-and-goal, there's a Tennessee touchdown.
And all the Sunday quarterbacks wouldn't be second-guessing Cutcliffe and head coach Phillip Fulmer, wondering why the Vols don't just line up, hand the ball to the tailback and blow the defense off the line of scrimmage for a couple of yards.
"It's just one of those things,'' said Fulmer. "If one of those flat passes is completed to make a first down, nobody ever says anything.
"And if you run an off-tackle play and don't make it ... We hope to be more consistent on third-and-short.''
No one dialed up Vol Calls to complain last year when a third-and-1 pass against Marshall resulted in a 47-yard Jayson Swain touchdown.
No one questioned UT's manhood when a third-and-1 pass to tight end Brad Cottam went for 25 yards against LSU.
Cutcliffe said Tuesday he's got about five seconds to decide on a play call and pass it on down to the sideline.
"I'm pretty quick,'' he said. "Sometimes it's a lot less than that.
"Whether it's third-and-3 or third-and-8, it takes thought, experience, execution and all those things.
"If you have a sound plan you feel good about and you get whipped, you get whipped.''
Fulmer called plays from 1989 until his promotion to head coach in 1993. He loved it.
"You do most of your work during the course of the week,'' he said. "It's not all of a sudden thinking of a play.
"You've talked through the scenarios and everybody has their input. That's why you're here until 10:30, 11, 11:30 at night.''
Keep that in mind Saturday when it's third-and-a-long-1 at the Florida 36.
Cutcliffe will have five seconds to make his play call, taking into consideration field position, Florida's personnel and formation and who knows how many other factors.
He'd love to just hand the ball to Foster and get a couple of yards.
If only it were that simple.
Mike Strange may be reached at 865-342-6276 or strange2@knews.com.
© 2007, Knoxville News Sentinel Co.
Want to use this article? Click here for options!
Vols' spring practice wit…










Scripps Interactive Newspapers Group
Comments » 37
Ironcity writes:
Oh boy the coaches opened pandoras box with some of these comments and in particular the would of could of should of senerios. Bottom line the reason we can't convert third and one is because we are no longer committed to the run like we use to be. Teams don't respect our ability to just line up and play smash mouth.
DadwasaVol writes:
The Vols still have the potential to be a smash mouth running team. We'll find out more Saturday.
grvol writes:
Vol coaches think too much but they are not great thinkers. How can an offense that appears so simple and unfortunately predictable to the defense be made so complicated for Vol players? Seems it only works to keep the best talent off the field because "they don't yet have a grasp of the offense." Like being the fastest runner, but intentionally shooting yourself in the foot before the race.
ashvol#469016 writes:
"We used to just line up, third-and-2 or less, it was automatic, you were going to line up and run the ball and make the first down.''
That statement speaks volumes about our program. The odds of doing just that have to be better than attempting a pass or using some gadget play, doesn't it?? call me crazy, but why not commit to the run like we used to? if they stop it, they stop it. That's what smash-mouth SEC football is all about. We should be able to execute.
chadbuckles#235104 writes:
Maybe they take a play out of other teams books and have a quick count on 3rd down, instead of being on the line and making sure we get the right play called. Quick snap and get a first down. Do something different!
tractoronthepole writes:
I think (hope) you guys are wrong. If you read between the lines and Cutcliff keeps the mentality he had at haftime of the USM game we are going to play smash mouth. My only hope is that we continue to set up the run with the pass, if so the 3rd and shorts will be ok. If we are hell-bent on running first it could be a long night.
bigorangesob writes:
I think we are shaping up to be a pretty good team, I also thinks we are gonna kick some gator butt this wknd, provided the D holds up
threehundredbowler writes:
It seems we are the only team in the SEC that has a hard time with 3rd and short situations.Any team playing us has no trouble with 3rd or 4th down conversions.If it's third or fourth and anything, our opponents have absolutely no problem converting.Just ask Flordia,Georgia,Alabama,LSU or any other elite program we have played in the last 10 years.Can anybody say Chavis?
bigorangebluegrass writes:
i think the college game is evolving towards an NFL style of play. you have faster athletes, with an emphasis on defensive speed and spread-offenses. the "smash mouth" style was a beautiful thing to watch, but defenses, particularly those in the SEC, have galvanized themselves against that style of play. i think that's what cutcliffe was alluding to. maybe, tn is not getting AS many NFL prospect athletes as it was in the 90's, but we've obviously got talent, it's just not as easy to "smash mouths" anymore...as far as saturday goes, i like chad's idea of a hurry up on 3rd & short. fla's d is young; catch 'em with their pants down. we witnessed that first hand @ cal when longshore quick snapped and threw to jackson for a td.
go vols
invisiblekid writes:
Biggest problem with playing smashmouth in recent years is the fact that we haven't had the road graders up front like a Davis, Clifton, Galbreath, or Coleman to go along with not having a legitimate blocking fullback since Bartholomew. Factor in some apparent tendencies in play calling in 3rd and short over the years and it's no wonder it's become a sore spot. Right now, I think they are calling those flare passes a little too much. If they bring a safety up to blitz, try going over the middle with a tight end on play action every now and then. Georgia has killed us with that in the past. I don't care how they get the first down whether it is running or passing, but they need to get it through these players heads to get past the marker if it is a pass. A little field awareness can go a long way.
utnutt writes:
FOOTBALL IS NOT A COMPLICATED GAME IF YOU RUN THE BALL WELL YOU USE THE CLOCK UP AND KEEP THE OTHER TEAMS OFFENSE OFF THE FIELD. THIS USUALLY WEARS THE OTHER TEAMS DEFENSE DOWN AS THE GAME GOES ON. ITS A SNOW BALL GOING DOWN HILL. WE JUST DONT SEEEM TO BE ABLE TO DO IT LIKE WE USED TO IN THE LATE 90S. WHY WHO KNOWS?
DarthVol writes:
"If the Vols make a couple of those short-yardage plays at Cal, chances are they win." Are you kidding? I had to scroll back to the top to make sure this article wasn't written by Fulmer.
TurboFan writes:
You're right Darth, take away the Jackson punt return (-7 for Cal) and make the 3 yards that Foster left short of the goalline (+7 for UT) and score would have been tied at 38! I-kid is totally on track, we don't have the future NFLers on the line of scrimmage anymore to knock people off the ball. Either side of the line! The problem with the flare pass to the RB out of the backfield is that all the safeties and corners are up close for the short yardage. By the time the pass gets out to the flat, the corner has side stepped the inept blocking by the WR and is waiting on Foster. Make that first guy miss and he is gone. Don't, and he doesn't, and it is a loss of yardage.
eb502us#225637 writes:
I've said it before and I'll say it again.....Cutcliffe is the most overrated OC in the country. He and Randy Sanders shared one trait.....great QB coach and average OC. If the stupid play calling continues.....Fulmer deserves to take the heat. I'm tired of the "if" word he continues to use!!
marc_ash#231781 writes:
Seven_pin, Lighten up.
marc_ash#231781 writes:
I'm not as concerned with converting 3rd down as I am stopping 3rd down. Year in and year out the Vols have issue with stopping teams on 3rd down going back to Jamarcus Russells 4th and forever conversion against the Vols.
UT seems to have it together during the first 2, but often lays down on third down. I don't know if it is a mental factor or not, but lets hope they get it togegther in the next couple of days becasue 3rd down will be a key in winning on Sat.
Sheepscape writes:
3rd down on either side of the ball makes me pucker up.
arkyvol writes:
maybe cutcliffe ought to confer with chavis. chavis is a marvel at turning third and short or third and long, or third and medium into first downs.
orangebloodgmc writes:
I agree with Chad, tractor, and i-kid. Gotta mix it up. Now which gives opposing defense best chance to stop us: leave 'em guessing and they guess wrong, or point straight to what we are going to try and then attempting that? But my main beef with what we have been running is, if we think we gotta pass on 3rd and two, then send it at least 2yds down field, and not behind line of scrimmage. Play action pass to big tight end sounds good.
thevol writes:
I agree with keeping the game simple JC. But, come on do you really think UT's playbook is over 80 pages longer than USC's? That is ridiculous.
westennvol writes:
FYI, for all of you that are planning on watching the game on TV like me, get ready for verne lundquist to start ramblin on about how great the gators are, and won't mention one thing positive about the Vols. I ran into him last year after the bama game at chesapeake's in k-ville. He was kissing butt up to the tide fans in the restaurant. Oh how i LOATHE him! Every game, every year is different, but some things never change. Oh well, if it gets too bad, we can turn the TV down, and turn on Vol Network and listen to Bob Kesling.
stevefinnegan#262805 writes:
If UT coaches could make up plays as well as they generate excuses, we wouldn't have conversion problems. For every excuse they create, there are countless examples, both college and pro, that expose their assertions for what they are...excuses. I guarantee UF will convert more than a few 3rd and shorts with a quick scramble from Tebow on Sat. Look at the Colts with a conversion rate in the high 60's on 3rd. Yes, players on D have gotten bigger, stronger, and faster. Does that mean our Offense is shrinking? No, players at all positions have gotten bigger and better. What hasn't changed is the same uninspired play calling whether it be Fulmer or Cutcliffe. Personel switches (ie..Taylor at snap) are great except when you run 16 secs off the clock before you snap the ball. That sort of reduces the 'surprise' factor. These guys need to stop making excuses and perform. To try to validate their ineptitude by recalling a few play calls that actually did work in the past is disgusting. UT needs to regain its self-respect and get back to national prominence. Like him or not, could you ever imagine Spurrier begging for sympathy and extolling 'just how hard it is' to coach these days?!!?!
inquiry writes:
I think it is that simple.. you have a great line against a new defensive front and linebackers.. they eat beef all year long for free and lift weights for 8 months out of the year.. we can't make a 1 yard gain after all that, we should be asking ourselves why not..
Don't be "cute" Cutliffe.. play Tennessee power football
voiceofreason writes:
How many of the 106,000 at the game Saturday didn't know what was coming when Crompton lined up in the shotgun on third and short?
To play smash mouth football you must use a fullback. The only time we were in the I formation with a fullback directly behind the QB, Foster gained 12 yards and almost scored.
grvol writes:
Westennvol it will have to get pretty damn bad for me to listen to Bob Kesling.
wyomingvol writes:
Gimmicks don't work. I formation, tight end, full back, running back. Beat em' up and the next short yardage will be all the much easier.
No Crompton, No Taylor, No 5 receiver sets...
Run the ball, find a fullback (we ditched ours, smart... not really) And get an f'in first down.
The winners in the SEC can RUN, no matter what.
jtp1576#208113 writes:
Here's a 3rd and short idea. How about we line up with plenty of time on the play clock, and Ainge walk back and forth barking fake play changes, then as soon as he goes under center we snap the ball. I slight change of lining up quick and snapping, but mostly the same idea - catching the gators off balance.
Basketball_Jones writes:
Here's another idea Coach Cut...YOU HAVE TO CHANGE WITH THE TIMES! I have said for 3 years now that we need a guy like Norm Chow, someone who can simplify the offense and bring in explosive players. Chow is a better QB coach than Cut, look at what he has produced, Philip Rivers, Carson Palmer, Matt Leinart, he ocached John David Booty. Coach has Peyton on his resume, thats it the rest didn't do squat in the NFL. He even said he wouldn't change VY's throwing motion cause it worked for him.
Now as far as a way we can get 3rd and short, give the ball to play makers! I mean all we hear in the off season is about how athletic this new group is but they don't see the field. How about putting Eric Berry in as a decoy, maybe that will throw teams off....something new please, I mean my 63 year old dad said they run the same offense they did back when he was in HS....
hueypilot writes:
Some do's and don't on third and short.
Never line up in the gun. Make the defense respect the run and commit to stopping it. Don't let them sit there and read the qb 3 yards deep. If it's a pass, take advantage of play action, which is pretty much ineffective out of the gun. (While I'm at it you should probably junk play action on third and long. Everybody knows you're going to throw it on third and twelve, and they're not gonna slow down one eye blink if you fake it to the running back.)
If you're gonna throw it, make sure the receiver is past the marker. The easiest tackle in football is for the defender to come up behind the receiver as he is making the catch and running laterally. No forward progress after the catch. My grandmother could make that tackle.
If you're gonna run it, use a lead blocking fullback, or give it to the fullback on a quick hitter, and run it behind your best run blocking lineman. And if you don't think you can make a yard running your best back behind your best lineman with a lead blocker, you shoulda stayed home and forfeited the game.
fryed004#518992 writes:
Why is it that we can't convert 3rd and short..but the opponent seems to be able to convert 3rd and whatever, the longer the higher rate of success? What's up with that?
IPOrange writes:
I think it has to do with predictability. I've been blasting the Vols' inability to convert because they aren't pounding the ball on the ground. They try these cutsie plays (see previous article). The truth, however, is that there are times to use such plays. It seems that the opponent usually knows what to expect from us, whether we run it, pass, or whatever. Why would that be?
BuckFama writes:
It will not matter what plays are called in short yardage situations during Saturday's game. Tim Tebow will be on the Florida sideline giving our defense his Super-Duper Jump Pass Evil Eye and our guys will have no chance.
mparker writes:
you fans are freaking idiiots!!! "oh, we used to be able to play smash-mouth football"
Look at the defenses in the SEC. Every team out there has NFL-quality players. The SEC is so much better than it' ever been.
I'm no apoiogist for the vols. but I'll tell you this: on third or fourth down, you better run a play with some options because if you don't, you won't be coaching long.
mparker writes:
...and someone else wrote 'it seems that our opponents know our plays'
okay, to simplify: these teams have staffs and coordinators who study film and create tendancy charts. Many also have years of experience against the vols. they have a pretty good idea. add to that the closing speed of today's athletes. It's not just UT fielding fast d's any more, every one is.
you guys need to grow up and realize 2 things: 1) Phil gets talent to come to UT because he gets them a chance at the NFL and a decent life if they follow the rules and
2) college football is pretty much determined by what happens in recruiting season.
mparker writes:
...and I guess one more thing for you guys who are whining about the runs and play calls:
If you want to smash Phil, his recruiting style (linemen 1 year, receivers one year, qb's one year) is fair game. But if you want to criticise the kids who execute, or the coaches who call the plays, then you are a damned fool. Most of you would soil your pants being in front of 100k and on national tv doing this stuff.
ah, hell, it's useless, why did I waste the diskspace to post this.
Sheepscape writes:
Yeah really, I am wondering why you wasted the space as well. Thanks for your razor sharp contributions. One would normally have to go to a bowling alley to meet someone capable of utilizing 'damned fool' and 'soil your pants'
Devastating rebuke to us all, no doubt.
mparker writes:
oh, ok sheep, sorry to disappoint you. keep up you smashmouth, works every time. I'll bet you'll be the first one crying in your beer... oh shoot, sorry, that's bowling alley stuff. I meant, the first one spilling your martini when they don't make it ('why do they keep running it up the middle, can't they see the defense has 9 in the box').
Sigh.
look, seriously, all I'm saying is to give the coaches a break on this. It is a hard down and distance nowadays.
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.