Adams: Tar Heels able to do what Vols couldn't

CHARLOTTE, N.C. - What worked against Tennessee didn't work against North Carolina. And it didn't take Louisville long to figure that out Saturday night at Bobcats Arena.

The Cardinals dominated the rebounding, held UT to 33.9 percent shooting and easily overcame 20 turnovers in a 79-60 victory Thursday night in the Sweet 16 of the NCAA tournament.

One round later, the difference was obvious from the outset.

No. 1-ranked North Carolina built a 12-point lead in the first 13 1/2 minutes, withstood a Louisville countercharge in the second half and pulled away down the stretch for an 83-73 victory that carried it to its 17th Final Four.

The Tar Heels did what UT couldn't. They beat the Cardinals on the boards and made them pay for their 19 turnovers.

"They overpowered us down the stretch," Louisville coach Rick Pitino said. "It's sometimes difficult to admit the other team's better. They just played better."

This wasn't just about what Louisville did wrong. It was about what Louisville didn't have: All-American center Tyler Hansbrough.

His talent and effort were never more evident than in the 28-point, 13-rebound performance against Louisville's talented, athletic front line. He made 12 of 17 field-goal attempts, most of which were hotly contested.

"The shots he made were unbelievable," Pitino said. "They were under duress. He had very little time to get it off. You've got to give credit to a great basketball player."

Pitino said he had never coached against a player who exerted so much effort on every possession. Louisville center David Padgett provided the "amen."

"I've never played against somebody who plays that hard," Padgett said. "He's just absolutely determined to be a great basketball player."

Hansbrough aside, Louisville at least made the Carolina-dominated crowd sweat. When the Cardinals tied the game at 59-all, imagine how many Tar Heels were flashing back to last year when their team blew an 11-point, second-half lead in losing to Georgetown in the Elite Eight.

"That was in the back of a lot of our minds," Hansbrough said. "The difference this year, we handled that run better and stayed poised."

This time, there was a finishing kick, rather than a collapse. The Tar Heels outscored Louisville 17-9 in the last 6:10.

Turnovers were a factor for the Cardinals both early and late. Six of the Tar Heels' first 12 points came off Louisville turnovers. And when the Cardinals were struggling to make a game of it in the last few minutes, they committed turnovers on three of four possessions.

"We made a few turnovers down the stretch that really shot ourselves in the foot," Pitino said.

Louisville's turnovers proved to be little more than an annoyance against UT. They were crucial against North Carolina.

Moreover, the same Louisville defense that repeatedly throttled the Vols couldn't hold off the Tar Heels, who too often got to the basket whether the Cardinals were playing man-to-man or their 2-3 zone.

And when the North Carolina offense couldn't produce a clear shot, there was still the Hansbrough option.

"(Hansbrough) made two shots that you pray they're gonna take," Pitino said. "I was following the flight of the ball. He couldn't even see the basket. He's going to make some pro team very happy."

And he's going to make a lot of college teams happy to see him go.

Sports editor John Adams may be reached at 865-342-6284 or adamsj@knews.com.

Get Copyright Permissions © 2008, Knoxville News Sentinel Co.
Want to use this article? Click here for options!

© 2008 govolsxtra.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

  • Discuss
  • Print

Comments » 15

nicksjuzunk#646117 writes:

Another great cheap shot by Adams to point out about how UT athletics just can't seem to measure up.

Gigavol writes:

If you have not noticed, the KNS has a pattern of tying National news to their circulation area. This is a regular pattern throughouth the KNS. Unfortunately for you people who want to read UT marketing propoganda, there was little he could do but state the facts.

I would not have read "North Carolina handles Louisville", but I did read whatever title they used. The article was exactly what I expected, though. I appreciate the story.

Adams summarized the game without pointing fingers. And fingers need to be pointed. I think Pearl rocks, but I will not stand and hold Pearl's 'coffee cup' while he does his mornthing stretch.

Again, this forced localization is KNS-wide, not John Adams.

TheVolMan writes:

Re post #1, the Weenie conspiracy theorists continue their head-in-the-sand boycott. No, wait, they are still reading Adams' columns. LOL...

Good points JA about the Heels. What they did to a good physical UL team was impressive.

invisiblekid writes:

I believe the stat of the game was 9 points off of 14 Louisville turnovers in the first half Thursday night. Not capitalizing off of those turnovers was the Vols downfall. It put them in too deep of a hole and, to their credit, they fought back within one point in the second half. However, the Vols faded down the stretch against a team that was athletically better than them.

littleorange writes:

I only read the typical Adams "cheap shot" headline....Can you please go back to La.?

b writes:

Thanks for the story, Captian Obvious.

WTF, does Adams actually add???

STFU and go away, Adams!!!

TommyJack writes:

Good article, Adams

cdldoc#211897 writes:

And none of us already knew the game's outcome? STFU Adams.

alfrizzle097 writes:

No need to be so hostile. I'm not a fan of the weaasle, but Adams simply made some observations about the differences in two programs. He has had plenty of positives about the basketball team and wasn't calling for someone's job this time. Back off of the STFUs and grow up people. You aren't six.

johnlg00#206211 writes:

Here in Greensboro, NC, the local paper made much out of Louisville's apparent fatigue against the 'Heels. Although they did not precisely say so, the clear implication was that Louisville had to expend so much energy in subduing the Vols that they wilted late against the 'Heels. I would have to say that UNC is the clear favorite for the title right now, though (ugh!) Memphis was impressive in crushing Texas. This year's Vols did well with what they had. UNC would have likely embarrassed us. We must be, and I think will be, much tougher mentally and physically to advance farther than we did this year. The Vols' future remains bright. Please stay, Bruce and Tyler! Please get better, everyone else! The best is yet to come!

GlennMaxwell writes:

Hold your heads high, VolNation. If all goes well, you'll be able to say next week that you were the only team to beat this year's national champs.

Go Tigers!

airship writes:

good article john. you are not always right, but who is?

hueypilot writes:

I guess I don't get the Memphis (ugh) comment. I am for Tennessee. If they can't win it, I'll pull for whoever else is in the running that I feel some connection to. Kansas? UCLA? North Carolina from the ACC? I don't think so. Go Tigers. Bring that trophy home to Memphis and never forget that if you do win it all, one night in Memphis, in the middle of your magical season you were bested by a better team, your bitter rival, the Vols.

Bigger_Al writes:

John Adams cheats at 4-way stop sign intersections.

johnlg00#206211 writes:

My Memphis comment was somewhat tongue-in-cheek payback for some of the Memphis idiots posting on here. I too favor Memphis over any of the other Final Four participants. Frankly, they have surprised me with how well they have played in the NCAAs. I am usually one of those who prefers that UT's opponents look good, because, whether WE win or lose against them, it makes us look better if they win. It would be nice to be able to say that we have a winning record against the last THREE National Champs!

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.

Features