DESTIN, Fla. — SEC football coaches on Wednesday passed a measure calling for the league to nationally propose an annual one-day only early signing period for high school prospects.
Recruits who haven’t taken an official visit to a school, yet who have committed to that school, would be eligible to sign national letters-of-intent on the Monday before Dec. 1.
Unlike basketball, which has an early signing period in October, football has but one signing period starting on the first Wednesday in February.
The SEC proposal, which passed by a 9-3 vote among football coaches here on the second day of the annual league spring business meetings, is expected to be approved on Friday by the presidents and chancellors of the 12 SEC schools. Then, the league will take the proposal to the NCAA to hopefully get it approved.
The three coaches voting against the proposal were Florida’s Urban Meyer, South Carolina’s Steve Spurrier and Arkansas’ Bobby Petrino.
“If a kid knows what he wants to do, then let him sign early,” Ole Miss coach Houston Nutt said. “You don’t want to add a visit. You don’t want to add contacts. When he signs, it’s one less worry. He’s on the dotted line and he’s done, instead of a coach trying to guard the chicken and make sure nobody steals the eggs.”
Mississippi State coach Sylvester Croom, chairman of the league football coaches, said the proposal makes sense.
“A lot of these kids have already been to our campus on unofficial visits, they’ve seen our academic counselors and they’ve seen everything on our campus they’ve needed to see,” Croom said. “They want to get signing out of the way.
“Now, we don’t have to call that kid every day or go to that kid’s high school every week. We can be recruiting somebody else.”
A recent survey conducted by the American College Football Coaches Association revealed 70 percent of head coaches favor an early signing period for high school recruits. Grant Teaff, executive director of the AFCA said that the AFCA survey indicated that schools have an average of 13.2 commitments by mid-December.
Teaff also said the AFCA survey of every state high school association in America favor of an early signing date.
Alabama coach Nick Saban said he has been a long-time proponent of an early signing period in some form. But he added that he really likes what he and his fellow league coaches have now formulated.
“I think this is the best concept we could have, because it minimizes most concerns,” Saban said. “I’m for it, but all coaches are paranoid. They’ll have to go back and digest this, and figure out if this is an advantage for this school or that school. But the rule would be the same for everybody.”
LSU coach Les Miles said signing early eases the pressure on the signee.
“If a kid knows that he always wanted to go to LSU, he signs and he knows he has a scholarship,” Miles said. “It allows that kid to go ahead and concentrate on his winter sport in high school, whether it is basketball or wrestling. After he signs, the kid can still take an official paid visit.”
Miles said an early signing day also helps a coach simplify his recruiting.
“You know who you’ve signed early, so you recruit to your remaining needs,” Miles said.
There’s the feeling from most coaches that they could sign at least half of their recruiting class with an early signing date.
“Last year, we probably had 18 or 20 guys committed halfway through football season,” Saban said. “If half of those guys could have signed early, then we wouldn’t have had to keep pursing them.”
Tennessee's signing class for 2012
Memorable moments in Pat Summitt's…











Scripps Interactive Newspapers Group
Comments » 13
imw8n4u writes:
So who are the 3 that voted against it? Was Fulmer one of them?
murrayvol writes:
Don't know about Fulmer but I'll bet Richt was among the 3.
99gator writes:
urban thinks this is a horrible idea. not enough time for the kid to make an informed decision about the school or the school to make an informed decision on the kid.
not saying that he's right or not, i don't know. but, that's the basis of his opinion.
the other thing i think he doesn't like is that the first signing period would be during the season.....when you are concentrating on playing games.
i am not a coach, so i don't know what is good or bad. i know people will adapt though.
FWBVol writes:
Petrino doesn't want an early signing period because it will look bad when he inks a kid in December and coaching somewhere else in February.
I would say I can see Urban's point about kids and coaches having time to make an informed decision, but most of the kids a school signed in February have been committed for several months. A player can't commit until Fulmer, Saban, Meyer...offer a scholarship. If you follow Urban's logic, he doesn't offer any scholarships before December and we know that's not true.
Between unofficial visits, internet research and national television coverage, most kids have more than enough time to make an informed decision.
For those ditching Fulmer and questioning him on this issue, in a story posted on this site yesterday, CPF was one of the first coaches to say he favored an early signing period of some sort.
I like the idea, and I hope other conferences and the NCAA will follow the lead of the SEC in this area.
WorkinLikeHeck writes:
No quotes from Foolmore?
volfan73120#211815 writes:
Working, why do you have to continue showing what a jerk you are? Everyone already knows.
gnm53108 writes:
Dont care one way or the other.Just bring em in,put em in orange and win.I like the way our early recruiting is looking but I sure would feel better if we had a monster DT or two already committed.I know were after a few.
Lookin forward to a cold,frost brewed koolaid weekend!
GreerVol22 writes:
99Gator, good stuff. However, my backseat driver opinion is that kids should sign as they please. If the university thinks enough of them to offer them a scholly then the schools mind is already made up. The rest is between the parents and the kid to follow their hearts. Only the prima donnas and drama queens like Pryor will hold out until the end.
Volgrad777 writes:
In todays game you cant always study a kid until you know hiw uncles first cousin twice removed. If the kid has the talent offer him , it might be good might be bad , thats just the risk of college football. How many scholarships we would we have loved to taken back here at UT and given to someone else that turned out well at another school , plenty im sure. If youre not sure about a kid , dont offer him , tell him to take his visits before he commits in the normal signing period. It only makes sense that this is the right thing for the kids.
CoverOrange writes:
I don't see how being two months earlier is "early". Like Greer said, the coaches have officially made up their minds on kids when they offer the scholarship and they do it as much as a year ahead of the current signing day. It is up to the kids after that.
The "early" signing period should be the first Monday before August 1, not December. This reeks of "we want to cut down our travel during Christmas" more than helping the kids.
GoVol writes:
I don't particulary like this idea because I think a kid should take some school visits in order to make a more informed decision prior to signing. I equate it to signing by virtue of emotion versus signing after you've had a chance to review all of your options. This is probably good for some of the coaches, but not so good for some of the recruits.
FWBVol writes:
touchdown and work, it's better to keep your mouths shut and be thought a fool than to open it and be known as one.
How many of you that complain about the lack of DTs have attended high school football games on a regular basis lately.
My job requires that I see 10-15 high school games a year here in Florida. I have news for you, there aren't that many stud defensive tackles out there. Your typical high school DT is between 5-11 and 6-2 and goes about 220-240 pounds.
A lot of high schools are going to three-man fronts because they don't have enough big guys to fill the defensive line.
Believe me, if I saw a legit defensive tackle out here, I'd let UT know about him. They just aren't out there.
TommyJack writes:
DCF: You're usually right. But the fact remains, other schools are signing DT's. Perhaps they intend to "grow them"...that's cool. Seems to me that we are not signing many, if any, of'em.
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.