Dave Hooker audio
Mississippi State Bulldogs
Related stories
To be completely literal, Tennessee's offense was 139 times better on Saturday night in Neyland Stadium than it was seven days earlier at Georgia.
Facing one of the SEC's most physical teams in Mississippi State, the Vols rose to the challenge and rushed for 139 yards a week after picking up 1 net yard against Georgia.
What's more, they converted third downs with greater frequency, and they provided a clock-killing scoring drive in the fourth quarter exclusively on the ground.
In Tennessee's 34-3 victory over Mississippi State on Saturday - its first SEC win of the season after starting 0-3 - the Vols made a step forward.
How big, though, remains to be seen.
"That team held Vanderbilt to 107 total yards last week," UT coach Phillip Fulmer said. "Our team took a challenge. We went back to a lot more base-type football in the run game. Our guys did a good job."
Especially in the second half.
The Vols (3-4, 1-3 SEC) committed many of the same mistakes in the first 30 minutes Saturday that it did against Georgia last week.
At halftime against State, UT had 119 yards of total offense on 25 plays.
It also produced only two field goals for a 6-3 lead, a product of converting on just two of six third downs in the first half.
But beginning with its first drive of the second half, Tennessee's offense began to pull out of its tailspin.
On third-and-7, quarterback Nick Stephens completed a 12-yard pass to tailback Montario Hardesty.
Later in the drive after Mississippi State stuffed Foster for no gain on third-and-2, Stephens hit Lucas Taylor for 9 yards to extend the drive.
Once more on third-and-10, Stephens, who completed 10 of 20 passes for 136 yards and no interceptions, found Austin Rogers for a 20-yard gain.
Two plays later, Hardesty dove across the goal line and gave UT a 13-3 lead that all but put the game out of reach.
"We found ways to stay on the field," offensive coordinator Dave Clawson said. "Not just that drive, but other drives. Those are the downs we've not been good at. Nick really has kind of got a cool head in there. We emphasized third downs a lot this week."
Coaches also emphasized being physical up front in the run game as well.
After losing senior guard Anthony Parker in the first quarter (as well as receiver Gerald Jones) to a high-ankle sprain, UT's offensive line managed to pave the way for 139 yards rushing, UT's most productive output since rolling up 266 yards on the ground against UAB on Sept. 13.
Despite lackluster totals the last two weeks, Clawson said the Vols must rely on the ground game from here on out.
"We have to be able to run the football," he said. "We have a veteran offensive line. We have three good tailbacks. We have a bunch of tight ends. We have a fullback that's playing well. Our running has to set up our throwing."
And the offensive line has to do its job in both, something junior Jacques McClendon said the Vols did on Saturday.
"As an offensive line, we've been called out," said McClendon, who began the game on the bench in favor of Vladimir Richard. "We knew we had to come out tonight and make a statement. I think we made that statement, but we definitely still can improve. We definitely took a step in the direction we want to go."
Same goes for UT's tailbacks, namely Lennon Creer, who finished with a team-high 68 yards on 17 carries and a touchdown.
UT's final scoring drive went 53 yards on 12 plays - and every time the ball went to Creer.
It was the kind of plodding, clock-melting drive the Vols haven't had in some time.
"It felt real good, especially after last week," Clawson said. "We worked real hard on running the football. I thought it was going to be a real challenge."
It won't get easier this week.
Tennessee hosts No. 2 Alabama, which entered Saturday's games with the No. 2 rushing defense in the nation and the SEC's 10th best total defense.
And for all the progress made Saturday, the Vols know they've got to make even more in another week's time. Asked what the next step is for Tennessee's offense as it prepares for the Crimson Tide, Clawson skipped right past improvement to the end result.
"We need to beat Alabama," he said. "Coach (Nick) Saban is obviously known to be a great defensive coach. They've got great coaches and great players, so it's going to be a really good challenge.
"Hopefully we can build off of what we did today and get better towards next week."
Tennessee's signing class for 2012











Scripps Interactive Newspapers Group
Comments » 25
Inquisitor writes:
First
tenuscvol writes:
The team actually began to look like the teams of old on some plays....Great game for the whole team and we fans certainly appreciated the effort and results.
GoVols..........Beat(No, KILL) BAMA!.....
FedUpVolFan writes:
Third!
philfan writes:
You accidentally forgot to mention that Mississippi state defeated Vandy and Auburn. They were ranked nationally at the time. Here are other puns to work into your stupid comments: PHILEMUP and FOOLMOREFANS.
tnbigg writes:
I will say this for offensive line. No doubt there was improvement. It took awhile to get something going that looked like improvement...but I did see it. The real test comes next week. Show some fight there or your efforts last night will be for naught...
tnbigg writes:
Last thought for offensive line;
Please ...please save the hot dog antics for intramurals. When you try to act like the old Miami hot dogs and you are having a terrible season it makes you look clueless. Just play and improve and keep the antics out of sight. Do you see Eric Berry acting like a hot dog? NO. Follow the example of a real super player...not some self absorbed goof balls.
richvol writes:
Beating someone who was ranked at one time doesn't mean much. Tennessee was ranked once and this is a poor Tennessee team...at least it's poor performing.
I hope we have another tough week of physical practice. We need the work and it will help prepare for Bama's very physical play.
ravensearay writes:
I agree, totally...
If Gerald is not good to go---why not put Eric in there to run the Gun- How exciting would that be??
tnbigg writes:
Drew...how many of those yards came in the 4th quarter? Just curious...
johnlg00#206211 writes:
Agree with some on here that this was a step forward, but it is still a long journey to get back to where we should be. The O-line looked a good deal better against a very physical and more than capable defense. The defense FINALLY seemed to realize that it just isn't good enough or deep enough to lay back and let the offenses just wear themselves out and then stop them short of the goal line--when it does. I'm not saying that was our defensive strategy most of this season, but it certainly seemed that way most of the time. Last night, we brought different kinds of pressure. We didn't sit back and wait for the offense to attack. We mixed things up. In short, the defense played like it really wanted to WIN THE GAME instead of just take up time on the field for--what?--the offense to rest? It bothered me that even after that much better result, Chavis was saying that AFTER we got the lead he felt comfortable bringing more pressure. Why not bring it early to help us GET THE LEAD! Knock the offense off balance from the jump! Especially when our offense hasn't proven to be a score-at-will-from-anywhere machine. Especially since we have proven over and over that we WILL get beat if we just let the offense do what it wants to do. Don't offensive coaches always say, "We do what the defense gives us"? Play aggressively to TAKE SOME STUFF AWAY! When you are down to two healthy D-tackles, why not try some three-man fronts? A thin defense is GOING to tire if it faces four or five 10+ play drives a game. Shorten the game by applying the pressure! Maybe they hit some big plays, but maybe we score on defense a few times, too. I'm VERY sorry to have gone on so long, but when I compare the way our defense played last night to the way we have played since...FOREVER!--it just chaps me no end!
djstatik writes:
you can be bitter or get behind this team.
Putting a whipping on Nama could really
Turn the season around. GO VOLS!
orangebloodgmc writes:
Like some of us have been saying for weeks, start Creer! If Creer is more decisive and explosive than Foster in cutting up into a hole, then that is true whether 4th quarter or 1st quarter.
leedsvol2007 writes:
Actually Auburn beat MSU 3-2.
MSU is better offensively having changed QB's and is stout defensively.
The fact we were able to run the ball against them is a good sign.
Bama is going to be a much tougher nut to crack. I don't like the match-up of the powerful left side of their offensive line against our defense.
But we should pose some problems for them in the secondary adn if we can at least keep our defense off the field and get a few breaks we will have a chance.
GoVols!
Go4Two writes:
This is a great set up game for Tennessee. Bama could over look Tennessee due to our poor start.
leedsvol2007 writes:
I have to agree with your thoughts on running a 3-4 at least in the long run.
Defensive tackle talent at all levels of football is the most difficult to find.
Linebackers and ends are much easier to come by.
And great nose guards do not have to be pass rushers so they can have quickness and strength without great speed.
With the recruiting limitations as they are it may be the better way to go.
sameolvolalum writes:
OK Phillip. Win this next one and you've bought yourself some time. 'Bama's in a position to be knocked off. 7 and 0 is a bit lofty for them and they might just be a little overconfident. Put together some offense and it can be done. This may be your last shot, big guy. go Vols!
orange71 writes:
Buck Fama!
billwall writes:
We have yet to recover a fumble and we will need one against Bama to win. Also, we don't need Berry in G-gun unless we throw out of it. It will only gain a few yards and waste time. If Berry is so good with the ball, why isn't he returning punts and kick-offs?
rockytop47 writes:
Man it is funny! All the trailer trash can't complain now! Worst part is all the Fulmer complainants don't contribute a dime to the University! So anyone with power doesn't listen! Really funny when you think about it. All the trash on this site, they complain, but no one cares! HAHA Cause all they do is support Coors Light and Wendy's! Maybe you should actually educate yourselves and donate to the acamdemic experience and then actually have a voice!!!!! REDNECKS!!!!!! GO FULMER!!!!!!!!!!!
abrown#232236 writes:
Creer broke arm tackles and spun out of situations where there was no hole, turning several potential losses into 2-3 yard gains. He is the only guy I've seen do that this year.
Rednekvolfan writes:
Whoa...whoa...wait a minute now! Watch what you call a redneck, you white collar, yellow blooded, Phillp Fulmer lovin, sissy! Im as redneck as they come and dang proud of it! I support this program with what I can, when I can. There is a large difference in the white trash you speak of and rednecks, but a brown-nose, money hungry trick like yourself wouldn have a clue as to what that may be! Truth be known white-trash and white-collar aren't so far apart though. They will both cut your throat to make an extra buck, and both will stab you in the back just to get ahead, while niether feel sorrow or regret for who they hurt or screw in
the processes! Oh, and here is a lil' education for you sir...This is a posting section for the article above. Its here to allow fellow fans to comment on what they just read. Sorry I may be a redneck, but I can't for the life of me see where your post had anything to do with what was mentioned in the above. So piss on you and your falling friend Fulmer!
With that said, I apologise to the other members here for my outburst to this seemingly ignorant person that thinks he is sooooo educated.
As for me I thought the boys played quite well! Both sides showed significant improvement, but as mentiond before they will have to have their A game ready for Bama next week. As for the Fulmer issue the big Q still lingers in all of our minds. Why the LLEH has it taken so long to make these coaching decisions? Leadership!
Great win team! GO VOLS!!!
wkjq#213863 writes:
first idiot
oldbasshead writes:
What happens if the team should win the rest of their games? Does that mean Fullmer stays? I hope not because we all know that success does not mean anything come the next season. Fulmer has demonstrated over and over again that he can't get the team ready to play until his back is against the wall. I would rather have a coaching staff that can prepare the players to play well right out of the gate. Wouldn't you?
Rednekvolfan writes:
Totally agree! That's why I don't understand these GO FULMER people. I've never said he wasn't a good coach. I just believe its becoming a faster paced game, and he is becoming slower. Every year rules are changing to speed up play as well. 4-5 games is wayyyy to long to make adjustments to start winning ball games! I remember when he/they could make these changes at half-time and be SUPER effective. He just can't do it anymore.
APPLEJAX555 writes:
G Gun needs to go away and never come back. Gimmicks dont win football games. Its a distraction to the boys, a drive killer, and easily predictable! Hard hitting, solid, fundamental football. Thats all we need to see --- EVER!!!
Go Vols!
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.