Related document
University of Tennessee officials are asking the NCAA to reconsider how schools report financial information after a June article in USA Today labeled the school one of the most subsidized Bowl Championship Series-qualifying programs in the country.
The school argues the numbers, which amount to $13.552 million in subsidies for UT, unfairly represents the departments' finances by including overhead charges that other schools are not reporting and leaving out contributions made back to the university.
"We take a lot of pride in what we do financially as compared to our peers, and it just really bothered me when that (story) hit USA Today," Joan Cronan, interim vice chancellor for athletics, told the board of trustees audit committee Tuesday.
Cronan told members that she has requested the NCAA Leadership Council, on which she serves, to take up the issue of standardizing financial reporting at the next meeting.
"Uniformity in reporting is important if you're going to compare institutions or if the media is going to be comparing institutions," said UT President Joe DiPietro.
According to Bill Myers, UT's chief financial officer for athletics, the subsidy figure reported for UT, which came from financial documents each university is required to send to the NCAA, has two flaws: There is no way to account for money the department gives back to the university and each school is filling it differently.
Athletics receives $1 million in student fees that go to fund women's programs, but it also estimates it returns more than $7 million in the form of scholarship funding, beautification projects and other ways. Only the $1 million shows up on the reporting form.
This could change as early as next year, Myers said, adding that other schools have raised the same issue.
"There is no way for the NCAA to know that my cash flow is $6 million back to the university," Myers said. The percentage of schools who give back is so small that it was not on the radar of NCAA officials, he said.
Cronan said she would like to eliminate the $1 million the athletics department receives from student fees and instead give $1 million less back to the university. The university is looking into that option but will have to first discuss it with students to ensure that money could be earmarked for scholarships or other academic ventures currently funded by athletics instead of supporting Lady Vols teams, said Chris Cimino, vice chancellor for finance.
The other issue with the report, Myers said, is that UT's figure also includes more than $4 million in overhead costs and $8 million in the depreciation value of facilities it uses, which other schools are either not reporting at all or are calculating differently, resulting in a lowered cost.
UT compared campus and system budgets to the athletic budget in order to determine athletics' share of university services like human resources and the finance department.
"If we answer it, we want to answer it like our peers answer it," said Cronan. "There's 12 institutions in the (Southeastern Conference) and we're the only ones who report it this way."
Tennessee's signing class for 2012











Scripps Interactive Newspapers Group
Comments » 10
FiftyOne writes:
Woop-ti-do.
How are the linebackers looking this week? That is what we want to know.
A1A writes:
Seems like I recall this very same story last year at this time.
dbc5361 writes:
The "Man" is always out to get poor lil UT's athletics department. The pressure to win for fans as passionate as the California and Florida schools but the setting of Kentucky or a Montana is a lot to overcome. Add to that a budget with no ceiling and winning becomes all too important.
SIMSVOL writes:
What do you expect from USA Today - not much.
orangeman1 writes:
So, maybe Hamilton wasnt the financial genius people said he was after all. Kind of like someone on welfare driving a new car and people thinking they are well off. I might not even understand how any of it works, but 13.5 million in subsidies sounds like alot for an athletic dept. to receive.
GiveHim6TDTennessee writes:
we care, why?
tdforvols writes:
He was asking about the UT linebackers not Florida's.
Bigger_Al writes:
Eff USA Today. And Witch Daddy too.
abnermc writes:
You obviously missed the point of the article. UT is one of only a few who 's athletics DO NOT receive subsidies.The method of reporting will be changed so that it is reflected.
VolzsFan writes:
For those that like to consider college athletics big business, let us enlighten you. Even at the current method of reporting, only about 14 schools cover their expenses. This method is flawed. They all receive subsidies in the way of Pell Grants and other government handouts. Without those, the revenue looks much different. In addition, a business has to pay for all of it's facilities etc that UT is whining about. Finally, they are all tax exempt. If not, college athletics the way we know it would be bankrupt.
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.