Vanderbilt loss kills Vols' momentum, invites bubble trouble

Mark Zaleski/Associated Press
Tennessee forward Jarnell Stokes, front, is fouled by Vanderbilt forward James Siakam after pulling down a rebound in the second half of a game Wednesday, Feb. 5, 2014, in Nashville, Tenn. Vanderbilt won 64-60.

Photo by Mark Zaleski

Mark Zaleski/Associated Press Tennessee forward Jarnell Stokes, front, is fouled by Vanderbilt forward James Siakam after pulling down a rebound in the second half of a game Wednesday, Feb. 5, 2014, in Nashville, Tenn. Vanderbilt won 64-60.

The Tennessee men’s basketball team is back in an uncomfortable, yet common, place.

Subscribe to read the full story

Current Subscribers - Activate Now

Already subscribe to the News Sentinel? Unlimited access to KnoxNews.com on the web, your smartphone, tablet, Knoxville.com and GoVolsXtra.com is included with your subscription. All you need to do is ACTIVATE now!

Activate Now

New Subscribers - Subscribe Now

Want to keep reading?
KnoxNews now offers Premium and Digital Subscriptions. Subscribe now and select how you want to keep up-to-date on local news, reader comments, photos, videos, blogs and more.

Subscribe Now

© 2014 govolsxtra.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

  • Discuss
  • Print

Related Topics

Comments » 21

wilk58 writes:

Learn from it and move on. When's the test?

scvols writes:

Vandy is a hard place to win, we can still do this.

WaitUntilNextYear writes:

Only making 61-67% of their layups, walking up the court and jacking bad shots...to some you should blame the coach, why aren't the players and their attitudes held accountable.
Don't expect much from the perseverance of this team and lacking a commitment to excellence and winning will leave them home early.

MooseandSquirrelVol writes:

“But you have experienced guys. The good thing is you will be able to bounce back, learn from it and move forward.”
========================================

Therein lies the rub.
I believe they can bounce back and move forward.
It appears to be the learning from it part that's missing.

oldster writes:

If the game plan was to walk the ball up the court, it was a stupid plan and the coach should be blamed. If they continued to play man defense with their point continually getting beat off the dribble, then the coach is at fault. Otherwise, the players screwed this one.

MichaelL writes:

Bring back Pearl.

magicbyswh#221420 writes:

Yes after every loss we will learn and move on, What we are learning is that we are again an NIT team. We have learned that over the past 2 years and we are learning that again this year. Can we now learn to win a first round NIT game. Also can we learn from Dave Hart who our next coach will be after this year?

ut_man1#1427524 writes:

Hopefully new players & new coach for next year! Why is it always next year with UT sports?

UT4prez writes:

in response to WaitUntilNextYear:

Only making 61-67% of their layups, walking up the court and jacking bad shots...to some you should blame the coach, why aren't the players and their attitudes held accountable.
Don't expect much from the perseverance of this team and lacking a commitment to excellence and winning will leave them home early.

Who should hold the players accountable? Yes it would be nice for them to hold theirselves accountable or each other but ultimately that falls to the coaching staff.

westknoxrepub writes:

We're 13-8 (Tusculum doesn't count), we're not on the bubble, we're squarely off of it and into the NIT. 3 years, no tournament, do the right thing, fire Martin, bring back Bruce.

sideline1 writes:

in response to oldster:

If the game plan was to walk the ball up the court, it was a stupid plan and the coach should be blamed. If they continued to play man defense with their point continually getting beat off the dribble, then the coach is at fault. Otherwise, the players screwed this one.

The pattern seems to be that when the players think they have the game won before they even begin to play, they play badly--Vanderbilt, Texas A&M, Xavier, NC State. When they think they will have to work to win, they play well--Virginia, LSU, Ole Miss., Alabama. Impacting how players think about any game is the coaches' job. We see the results of the players thinking when left to themselves. The Vols could have won at Kentucky if Martin had been as good at managing the game as Calipari was. Team motivation and Game management are coaches' responsibilities. McRea can score a lot of points, but he has yet to be held responsible for the lazy passes and ball handling that has cost the Vols points. More than once enough points to be the difference in winning and loosing.

underthehill writes:

in response to oldster:

If the game plan was to walk the ball up the court, it was a stupid plan and the coach should be blamed. If they continued to play man defense with their point continually getting beat off the dribble, then the coach is at fault. Otherwise, the players screwed this one.

Obviously ..you are correct..and how do you learn anything by getting beat due to lack of heart and effort..I thought there was more than a 50% chance of making the big show before this game..I now think it is less now..

irishcoffee writes:

in response to ut_man1#1427524:

Hopefully new players & new coach for next year! Why is it always next year with UT sports?

you may want to direct that question towards the former AD and current chancellor. their program of trying to get by on the cheap has brought the UT Athletic program to it's current level. thanks for the memories guys.

atnvol#283282 writes:

What is so puzzling to me is the lack of leadership....especially from McCrae. He slept walked thru the first half and took some freshman type shots down the stretch. Barton is terrible....seems like he wants to be the game hero at the end when others should be taking those shots. Our big men have no touch under the basket...hard balls off the glass. Maymon...well Maymon is just not the same player after the injury...he just cannot get off the floor and gets his shots blocked with ease. Stokes has improved...especially at the free throw line. I just don't see any sense of urgency ever with this team. I really wish this team could play "all in", but the writing looks like it is on the wall...NIT.

jandjhome#228397 writes:

Martin seems like a pretty nice guy but he is in way way over his head.

Sauce writes:

We were constantly getting embarrassed by those back door cuts and alley oops that Vandy always runs. Where was the game plan? Every game somebody buried on the bench pops out for some minutes. We should have been substituting guys in and out all night. That's watch you do to a team that has 3 or 4 stars and no bench. Wear them down physically. If this staff can't make that final 32 teams in the NCAA after 3 years, there is no hope for this program.

VibrantVol writes:

Our coaching staff is horrid. One of our former lettermen who attended the shoot around on Tuesday said that there was no gameplan mentioned the day before the game. We need to fire Martin for sure. Pearl is the answer. Cheek needs to swallow his pride & let Hart rehire him.

Sauce writes:

On further review, since Vandy had only 7 players, our top four players were forced to play at least 35 minutes...what?

ralphiefor3 writes:

in response to VibrantVol:

Our coaching staff is horrid. One of our former lettermen who attended the shoot around on Tuesday said that there was no gameplan mentioned the day before the game. We need to fire Martin for sure. Pearl is the answer. Cheek needs to swallow his pride & let Hart rehire him.

The talent on occasion masks this staffs ineptitude. Unfortunately we will see how bad they really are next year.

Snapshot writes:

in response to Sauce:

We were constantly getting embarrassed by those back door cuts and alley oops that Vandy always runs. Where was the game plan? Every game somebody buried on the bench pops out for some minutes. We should have been substituting guys in and out all night. That's watch you do to a team that has 3 or 4 stars and no bench. Wear them down physically. If this staff can't make that final 32 teams in the NCAA after 3 years, there is no hope for this program.

100% correct. They should have made it a track meet. With vandy having only 7 players on scholarship they should have pressed and been up and down the court the entire game. Remember when we played that kind of game? Now they struggle to score 60 points and get out coached in the process, pitiful.

fannotsheep writes:

You can't control the tempo when you can't force turnovers, hit jump shots, score transition baskets or even make layups. This team is more bipolar than any I have ever seen. They lack motivation. That seems to be a problem for many of today's elite athletes unless they are being paid millions of dollars to perform. Even then many of them seem to shrug off losses pretty easily.

Want to participate in the conversation? Become a subscriber today. Subscribers can read and comment on any story, anytime. Non-subscribers will only be able to view comments on select stories.

Features